nice model site

Joe Al · Post by **Joe Al** » Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:08 pm

jodietv · Post by **jodietv** » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:09 pm

Fuzzfan · Post by **Fuzzfan** » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:10 pm

Joe Al, Thanks much. Here are a few more before I ran out of time:

http://www.herfamedgoodlooks.com/hfgl/E ... selle2.jpg
http://www.herfamedgoodlooks.com/hfgl/E ... emma15.jpg
http://www.herfamedgoodlooks.com/hfgl/E ... marine.jpg

Also, it's that time of year again - be sure to check out http://www.jcrew.com - very nice though small new pix!

Boobsinwool · Post by **Boobsinwool** » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:52 pm

Very nice!
Thanks for sharing these.
/BIW

touchofsable · Post by **touchofsable** » Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:42 pm

YOU ARE GOING TO LOVE THIS ONE:

Admin's note: sorry, but I had to remove that nice pic because it showed a baby as well. Joe Al

There are more of Kristn in the smoking lounge of ye olde denn Pub.

PLEASE of you get nice shpts of ladies smoking (such as yje ones of scarlett johansen) please can you post them there too.

Here is another of Kim Noorda I thought you may like:

http://www.herfamedgoodlooks.com/hfgl/K ... kn28bp.htm

Boobsinwool · Post by **Boobsinwool** » Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:43 pm

Joe Al · Post by **Joe Al** » Sat Sep 02, 2006 4:39 pm

Hi folks,

thanks for the great finds, and thanks again to Touchofsable!

Woolly greetings,
Joe Al

touchofsable · Post by **touchofsable** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:19 am

You have GOT to be kidding me?????!!!!

You removed a shot because it showed a baby? there was NOTHING sexual in that. That is bordering on the ridiculous!!!

It was a truly beautiful shot; that played upon the nature of a mother and her love/protection of her own baby with such a soft jumper, and a gothic, hard instinct that was very very beautiful. It was Art...you are sensoring ART? What on earth is wrong with that?

Surely nobody here is going to jack off about the baby!!!!!! Those kind of people have their own forums; they are held in sewers.

jodietv · Post by **jodietv** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:31 pm

Thanks for sharing love this one
http://www.herfamedgoodlooks.com/hfgl/G ... line10.jpg

I agree with sable i think the removed pic was harmless as our attention would be on the sweater but it could be miss read by a stranger happening across this site. The last thing we need is for the ignorant to assume our love of sweaters has anything to do with children.
I copied the picture but to be on the safe side I cropped it to remove the baby. better safe than sorry i suppose or just plain paranoid. If anybody saw the picture on my hard drive they wouldnt see it as a picture of a beatiful sweater
Jodie xx

touchofsable · Post by **touchofsable** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:05 pm

OMG what kind of world do we live in where that could be misconstrued?

This is a beautiful shot from A Vogue or similar type magazine on every coffee table.
What...everyone with a picture of their or a relative's baby on their computer is a suspect for being a Peadophile?

It is dangeropus to send that message out. Very.

Ther is NO WAY that image could be miscontrued. It is the baby's mother for goodness sake.

You need to think about this.....what are we going to do.....eleiminate all pictures of babaies in Art, photos etc just because of a very tiny monority of sickos? Of which I would be certain there would be none here.

Melody O'Hair

nice model site

nice model site

reply